Hi Mark,
On 19 January 2017 at 19:16, Mark Rutland mark.rutland@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:32:55PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
On 19 January 2017 at 17:11, Hanjun Guo hanjun.guo@linaro.org wrote:
On 2017/1/18 21:25, fu.wei@linaro.org wrote:
From: Fu Wei fu.wei@linaro.org
else if (!gtdt->platform_timer_count)
pr_debug("No Platform Timer.\n");
else
timer_count = gtdt->platform_timer_count;
if (timer_count) {
platform_timer = (void *)gtdt +
gtdt->platform_timer_offset;
if (platform_timer < (void *)table +
sizeof(struct acpi_table_gtdt)) {
pr_err(FW_BUG "invalid timer data.\n");
It's ok but I didn't see other ACPI tables parsing did this check, maybe we can just remove it :)
here, I want to make sure the FW is valid. Once there is a FW bug, we could just return with error. :-)
Yes, please keep the check!
Yes, we will keep this check :-)
Thanks!
If anything, it would be nicer for the other ACPI code to verify things a little more stringently.
Thanks, Mark.