On 03/27/2014 01:15 PM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:28:04PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
On 03/12/2014 10:21 PM, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
Include the correct definitions for gic_acpi_init() when building with CONFIG_ACPI=n.
Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org
arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c index a99bfc7..9ea35113 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c @@ -25,11 +25,12 @@ #include <linux/irq.h> #include <linux/smp.h> #include <linux/init.h> -#include <linux/acpi.h> #include <linux/irqchip.h> #include <linux/seq_file.h> #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
+#include <asm/acpi.h>
unsigned long irq_err_count;
int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, int prec)
This patch set looks okay. Did it ever get an ack or get included in acpi.git?
It should be in there!
G
D'oh. My apologies. I forgot to look at the git tree.
Sigh. Must. Find. More. Coffee....