W dniu 07.11.2014 o 15:55, Liviu Dudau pisze:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 01:27:56PM +0000, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
Code inspired by arch/x86/pci/acpi.c and arch/ia64/pci/pci.c files. The main reasons why we need this:
- parse and manage resources (BUS, IO and MEM)
- create pci root bus and enumerate its children
- provide PCI config space accessors (via MMCONFIG)
Hi Tomasz,
I have some comments to your code:
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org
arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h | 8 + arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 401 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h index fded096..ecd940f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h @@ -33,6 +33,14 @@ static inline int pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int channel) extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI +struct pci_controller {
struct acpi_device *companion;int segment;int node; /* nearest node with memory or NUMA_NO_NODE for global allocation */+};
+#define PCI_CONTROLLER(busdev) ((struct pci_controller *) busdev->sysdata)
I am trying to move away from the model where the architecture dictates the shape of the pci_controller structure. Can I suggest that you put all this code and the one under #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI in a separate file, say arch/arm64/kernel/pci-acpi.c ? Or that you add an #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI around this structure definition?
I can't see anyone using this definition outside ACPI (due to struct acpi_device dependency) and I would like to avoid it conflicting with other host bridge drivers trying to define the same name structure.
That is good point, will do, thanks.
- static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return 1;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c index 42fb195..cc34ded 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ /*
- Code borrowed from powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
- Code borrowed from powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c and arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
- Copyright (c) 2002, 2005 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
- Copyright (C) 2004 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
- Copyright (C) 2003 Anton Blanchard anton@au.ibm.com, IBM
- Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Ltd.
@@ -17,10 +21,16 @@ #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/of_pci.h> #include <linux/of_platform.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/pci.h> +#include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/mmconfig.h>
#include <asm/pci-bridge.h>
+#define PREFIX "PCI: "
Where is this used?
Nowhere here, will remove/improve.
- /*
*/
- Called after each bus is probed, but before its children are examined
@@ -43,7 +53,8 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res, */ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) {
dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
if (acpi_disabled)dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); return 0;}
@@ -54,45 +65,399 @@ static bool dt_domain_found = false;
void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent) {
int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node);
int domain = -1;
if (domain >= 0) {dt_domain_found = true;} else if (dt_domain_found == true) {dev_err(parent, "Node %s is missing \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n",parent->of_node->full_name);return;
if (acpi_disabled) {domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node);if (domain >= 0) {dt_domain_found = true;} else if (dt_domain_found == true) {dev_err(parent, "Node %s is missing \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n",parent->of_node->full_name);return;} else {domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr();} } else {
domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr();
/** Take the domain nr from associated private data.* Case where bus has parent is covered in pci_alloc_bus()*/if (!parent)domain = PCI_CONTROLLER(bus)->segment;I would also like to wrap this into an ACPI specific function. Reason for it is that when I get to split the pci_host_bridge creation out of pci_create_root_bus() this will become a pci_controller property.
Make sense for me.
} bus->domain_nr = domain;} #endif
+static char __iomem *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
unsigned int devfn)+{
struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, bus);if (cfg && cfg->virt)return cfg->virt + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus) | (devfn << 12));return NULL;+}
- /*
- raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access.
- Default empty implementation. Replace with an architecture-specific setup
*/ int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val) {
- routine, if necessary.
return -EINVAL;
char __iomem *addr;if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) {+err: *val = -1;
I believe the general usage is to have labels on their own line.
return -EINVAL;}rcu_read_lock();addr = pci_dev_base(domain, bus, devfn);if (!addr) {rcu_read_unlock();goto err;}switch (len) {case 1:*val = readb(addr + reg);break;case 2:*val = readw(addr + reg);break;case 4:*val = readl(addr + reg);break;}rcu_read_unlock();return 0;}
int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val) {
return -EINVAL;
char __iomem *addr;if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095)))return -EINVAL;rcu_read_lock();addr = pci_dev_base(domain, bus, devfn);if (!addr) {rcu_read_unlock();return -EINVAL;}switch (len) {case 1:writeb(val, addr + reg);break;case 2:writew(val, addr + reg);break;case 4:writel(val, addr + reg);break;}rcu_read_unlock(); }return 0;These raw_pci_{read,write} functions are all ACPI specific so they can move into the new file as well.
Got it!
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI +static int pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where,
int size, u32 *value)+{
return raw_pci_read(pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number,devfn, where, size, value);+}
+static int pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where,
int size, u32 value)+{
return raw_pci_write(pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number,devfn, where, size, value);+}
+struct pci_ops pci_root_ops = {
.read = pci_read,.write = pci_write,+};
+static struct pci_controller *alloc_pci_controller(int seg) +{
struct pci_controller *controller;controller = kzalloc(sizeof(*controller), GFP_KERNEL);if (!controller)return NULL;controller->segment = seg;return controller;+}
+struct pci_root_info {
struct acpi_device *bridge;struct pci_controller *controller;struct list_head resources;struct resource *res;resource_size_t *res_offset;Why do you need to keep an array of res_offsets here? You only seem to be using the values once when you add the resource to the host bridge windows.
This is what I noticed too but did not improve that at the end. Let me fix that in the next ver.
unsigned int res_num;char *name;+};
+static acpi_status resource_to_window(struct acpi_resource *resource,
struct acpi_resource_address64 *addr)+{
acpi_status status;/** We're only interested in _CRS descriptors that are* - address space descriptors for memory* - non-zero size* - producers, i.e., the address space is routed downstream,* not consumed by the bridge itself*/status = acpi_resource_to_address64(resource, addr);if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) &&(addr->resource_type == ACPI_MEMORY_RANGE ||addr->resource_type == ACPI_IO_RANGE) &&addr->address_length &&addr->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER)return AE_OK;return AE_ERROR;+}
+static acpi_status count_window(struct acpi_resource *resource, void *data) +{
unsigned int *windows = (unsigned int *) data;struct acpi_resource_address64 addr;acpi_status status;status = resource_to_window(resource, &addr);if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))(*windows)++;return AE_OK;+}
+static acpi_status add_window(struct acpi_resource *res, void *data) +{
struct pci_root_info *info = data;struct resource *resource;struct acpi_resource_address64 addr;acpi_status status;unsigned long flags;struct resource *root;u64 start;/* Return AE_OK for non-window resources to keep scanning for more */status = resource_to_window(res, &addr);if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status))return AE_OK;if (addr.resource_type == ACPI_MEMORY_RANGE) {flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;root = &iomem_resource;} else if (addr.resource_type == ACPI_IO_RANGE) {flags = IORESOURCE_IO;root = &ioport_resource;} elsereturn AE_OK;start = addr.minimum + addr.translation_offset;resource = &info->res[info->res_num];resource->name = info->name;resource->flags = flags;resource->start = start;resource->end = resource->start + addr.address_length - 1;if (flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {unsigned long port;int err;err = pci_register_io_range(start, addr.address_length);if (err)return AE_OK;port = pci_address_to_pio(start);if (port == (unsigned long)-1)return AE_OK;resource->start = port;resource->end = port + addr.address_length - 1;if (pci_remap_iospace(resource, start) < 0)return AE_OK;You seem to leave around invalid resources every time you return in this code path due to your choice of ignoring error conditions.
I think there are a few things that can be streamlined in this patch, but overall I think it looks promising.
Thanks Liviu!
Tomasz