Hi Fu,
On 01/25/2017 01:46 AM, Fu Wei wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 25 January 2017 at 01:24, Mark Rutland mark.rutland@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:25:32PM +0800, fu.wei@linaro.org wrote:
From: Fu Wei fu.wei@linaro.org
The counter frequency detection call(arch_timer_detect_rate) combines two ways to get counter frequency: system coprocessor register and MMIO timer. But in a specific timer init code, we only need one way to try: getting frequency from MMIO timer register will be needed only when we init MMIO timer; getting frequency from system coprocessor register will be needed only when we init arch timer.
When I mentioned this splitting before, I had mean that we'd completely separate the two, with separate mmio_rate and sysreg_rate variables.
sorry for misunderstanding.
Are you saying :
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c index 663a57a..eec92f6 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c @@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ struct arch_timer {
#define to_arch_timer(e) container_of(e, struct arch_timer, evt)
-static u32 arch_timer_rate; +static u32 arch_timer_sysreg_rate ; +static u32 arch_timer_mmio_rate; static int arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_MAX_TIMER_PPI];
static struct clock_event_device __percpu *arch_timer_evt;
But what have I learned From ARMv8 ARM is AArch64 System register CNTFRQ_EL0 is provided so that software can discover the frequency of the system counter. CNTFRQ(in CNTCTLBase and CNTBaseN) is provided so that software can discover the frequency of the system counter. The bit assignments of the registers are identical in the System register interface and in the memory-mapped system level interface. So I think they both contain the same value : the frequency of the system counter, just in different view, and can be accessed in different ways.
So do we really need to separate mmio_rate and sysreg_rate variables?
And for CNTFRQ(in CNTCTLBase and CNTBaseN) , we can NOT access it in Linux kernel (EL1), Because ARMv8 ARM says: In a system that implements both Secure and Non-secure states, this register is only accessible by Secure accesses. That means we still need to get the frequency of the system counter from CNTFRQ_EL0 in MMIO timer code. This have been proved when I tested this driver on foundation model, I got "0" when I access CNTFRQ from Linux kernel (Non-secure EL1)
That sounds like a firmware problem. Firmware in EL3 is supposed to write the value into CNTFRQ. If you're not currently using any firmware, I'd recommend the bootwrapper on models/simulators/emulators.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mark/boot-wrapper-aarch64.git/tr...
Cheers, Cov