On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 11:24:30 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
For pci_acpi_crs_quirks(), ia64 already doesn't use it, and we can not foresee it should be used in ARM64, so stub out pci_acpi_crs_quirks() to avoid introducing platform specific dummy stub function.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo hanjun.guo@linaro.org
Bjorn, what do you think?
Looks OK to me. If you want to avoid the ifdef, we could put an empty weak version in pci_root.c. Either way,
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas bhelgaas@google.com
arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 1 - include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h index d651102..97cb160 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ ia64_acpi_release_global_lock (unsigned int *lock) #endif #define acpi_processor_cstate_check(x) (x) /* no idle limits on IA64 :) */ static inline void disable_acpi(void) { } -static inline void pci_acpi_crs_quirks(void) { }
#ifdef CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC const char *acpi_get_sysname (void); diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h index d504613..ea6428b 100644 --- a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h @@ -96,7 +96,12 @@ struct pci_dev *acpi_get_pci_dev(acpi_handle); /* Arch-defined function to add a bus to the system */
struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root);
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86 void pci_acpi_crs_quirks(void); +#else +static inline void pci_acpi_crs_quirks(void) { } +#endif
/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Processor
-- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.