Hi Guenter,
On 22 May 2015 at 23:05, Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:38:32PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
Hi Guenter.
Sorry for my poor English . let me explain this :
On 22 May 2015 at 21:23, Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 05/22/2015 03:46 AM, Fu Wei wrote:
Hi Timo,
[ ... ]
So I am still trying to improve pretimeout support :-)
Is there anything still missing from it ?
If I can make pretimeout merged, may be you can try pretimeout to implement early_timeout_sec function?
Not sure how one would or even could do that.
Do you mean "implement early_pretimeout_sec", by any chance ?
I mean: using pretimeout to implement the function you want, instead of early_pretimeout_sec
How would this work if the watchdog hardware doesn't support pretimeout ?
Pretimeout and early timeout are two logically different functions, with different goals, so I don't entirely (if at all) understand why it would make sense to tie them together.
Can you elaborate why you think this would be a good idea ?
sorry, my apology. forget about this, :-) I think we should focus on SBSA watchdog patch here, but not a early_timeout_sec.
Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html