On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 06:20:05PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2014-3-12 17:30, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:29:47AM +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:16:24PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2014年03月12日 17:04, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 04:17:21PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
On 2014-3-12 11:30, Ashwin Chaugule wrote: > Include the correct definitions for gic_acpi_init() > when building with CONFIG_ACPI=n. > > Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c Which git repo of this patch set based on?
Hi Hanjun, Tomasz,
Do you guys have an ETA on the next version of your patchset, I get feeling you have already covered some of the changes Ashwin made.
Would be good to get a newer version into acpi-mainline-core ASAP.
Yes, we have a newer version, but haven't finished yet, My thinking is that we update the patches according to the new proposals to ASWG and send them out internally for review, how do you think about that?
Hi Hanjun,
I think we need a version first which we can update acpi-mainline-core with. Basically a latest version of what we currently have. Then we can work on proto type changes.
Just to clarify I don't mean we need to send these upstream, just that we need to update the git repo.
I think we can merge Ashwin's patches into acpi-mainline-core and leave alone the new version of patches, you know, v2 patches are still working, is that ok?
Ok if you think there are no substansive changes we should make public before we are forced into this "dark" period.
Graeme