On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jayachandran C jchandra@broadcom.com wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Bjorn Helgaas helgaas@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:30:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:37:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Tomasz Nowicki tn@semihalf.com wrote:
[cut]
If we are moving the ACPI/PCI code from drivers/acpi to arch/arm64/ , there is an issue in having the header file ecam.h in drivers/pci
The current include of "../pci/ecam.h" is slightly ugly (Arnd and David had already noted this), but including the driver header from arch code would be even worse.
I can either merge ecam.h into include/linux/pci.h or move it to a new file include/linux/pci-ecam.h, any suggestion on which is preferable?
My preference would be pci-ecam.h as we did a similar thing for pci-dma.h, for example, but basically this is up to Bjorn.