On 24/07/2014 20:31, Al Stone wrote:
On 07/24/2014 01:10 PM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
Should we actually be maintaining these as linaro-ed2k topic branches now?
Graeme
Hrm. Probably. I've done these just for completeness. There is no topic branch for APM at the moment and while I could do that, it seems like that should be APM's prerogative (and a serious distraction for me).
Ah, I thought they had submitted a topic already!
G
On 24/07/2014 19:44, al.stone@linaro.org wrote:
From: Al Stone al.stone@linaro.org
These patches are my best guess at initial ACPI tables for XGene, in accordance with the new ACPI 5.1 specification.
These have not been fully tested yet but that process has been started.
Al Stone (3): APM / XGene: Minor cleanup of some of the basics APM / XGene: Update core tables to replace ACPI 5.1 changes APM / XGene: Add in empty SSDT for future use in developing complete tables
platforms/APMXGene.acpi/APMXGene.manifest | 1 + platforms/APMXGene.acpi/Apic.asl | 262 ++-- platforms/APMXGene.acpi/Dsdt.asl | 2215 ++++++++++++++++------------- platforms/APMXGene.acpi/Facp.asl | 57 +- platforms/APMXGene.acpi/Gtdt.asl | 87 +- platforms/APMXGene.acpi/Rsdp.asl | 2 +- platforms/APMXGene.acpi/Ssdt.asl | 21 + platforms/APMXGene.acpi/Xsdt.asl | 10 +- 8 files changed, 1508 insertions(+), 1147 deletions(-) create mode 100644 platforms/APMXGene.acpi/Ssdt.asl
Linaro-acpi mailing list Linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-acpi