On Monday 01 September 2014 22:57:51 Hanjun Guo wrote:
/* Collect CPU base addresses */count = acpi_parse_entries(sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt),gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu, table,ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT,ACPI_MAX_GIC_CPU_INTERFACE_ENTRIES);if (count < 0) {pr_err("Error during GICC entries parsing\n");return -EFAULT;} else if (!count) {/* No GICC entries provided, use address from MADT header */struct acpi_table_madt *madt = (struct acpi_table_madt *)table;if (!madt->address)return -EFAULT;cpu_phy_base = (u64)madt->address;}
After I read through ACPI-5.1 section 5.2.12.14, I wonder if this is the best way to treat a missing ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT table.
Do we expect to see those in practice? It seems like using the x86 local APIC address as a fallback for the GIC address is not something we should do unless we absolutely have to support a system that doesn't have the GIC table.
Arnd