Hi Lorenzo,
On 3 December 2015 at 01:02, Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:59:05PM +0800, fu.wei@linaro.org wrote:
[...]
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI +extern int acpi_disable_cmcff; +#endif
static inline void disable_acpi(void) { @@ -94,6 +97,7 @@ static inline const char *acpi_get_enable_method(int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI pgprot_t arch_apei_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr); +void arch_apei_flush_tlb_one(unsigned long addr); #endif
#endif /*_ASM_ACPI_H*/ diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c index d1ce8e2..811fea2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI # include <linux/efi.h> # include <asm/pgtable.h> +# include <asm/tlbflush.h> #endif
int acpi_noirq = 1; /* skip ACPI IRQ initialization */ @@ -41,6 +42,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_disabled); int acpi_pci_disabled = 1; /* skip ACPI PCI scan and IRQ initialization */ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI +int acpi_disable_cmcff; +#endif
There must be a reason why we keep all these arch agnostic ACPI flags in arch specific code, is there ?
very good point, will try to fix it in next patch :-)
Lorenzo
static bool param_acpi_off __initdata; static bool param_acpi_force __initdata;
@@ -233,4 +238,9 @@ pgprot_t arch_apei_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr) return __pgprot(PROT_NORMAL_NC); return __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE); }
+void arch_apei_flush_tlb_one(unsigned long addr) +{
flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
+}
#endif
2.5.0