On 26.05.2015 19:08, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:49:18PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Tomasz Nowicki tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org
ECAM standard and MCFG table are architecture independent and it makes sense to share common code across all architectures. Both are going to corresponding files - ecam.c and mcfg.c
While we are here, rename pci_parse_mcfg to acpi_parse_mcfg. We already have acpi_parse_mcfg prototype which is used nowhere. At the same time, we need pci_parse_mcfg been global so acpi_parse_mcfg can be used perfectly here.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo hanjun.guo@linaro.org Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com
arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 + arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h | 33 ------ arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 1 + arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c | 244 +--------------------------------------- arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_32.c | 1 + arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c | 1 + arch/x86/pci/numachip.c | 1 + drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 + drivers/acpi/mcfg.c | 57 ++++++++++ drivers/pci/Kconfig | 7 ++ drivers/pci/Makefile | 5 + drivers/pci/ecam.c | 245 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why can't we make use of the ECAM implementation used by pci-host-generic and drivers/pci/access.c?
We had that question when I had posted MMCFG patch set separately, please see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/11/492
Tomasz