Agreed, This patch was issued very long back. We use to have FDT and ACPI blob both.

Regards -Naresh

On 10 June 2014 17:39, Tomasz Nowicki tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org wrote:

Hi,

We need to revisited this driver, I have tried to run kernel with sysreg and got failure. Here is the reason: [...] static void __iomem *vexpress_sysreg_base(void) { if (!__vexpress_sysreg_base) { struct device_node *node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,vexpress-sysreg");

            __vexpress_sysreg_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
    }

    WARN_ON(!__vexpress_sysreg_base);

    return __vexpress_sysreg_base;

} [...]

So sysreg still tries to obtain info from FDT while now we are using pure ACPI kernel.

Regards, Tomasz

On 23.10.2013 13:23, naresh.bhat@linaro.org wrote:

...

From: Naresh Bhat naresh.bhat@linaro.org

Add match table and pointers for ACPI probing into vexpress-sysreg driver.

Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat naresh.bhat@linaro.org

drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg. c index 981bef4..9e39075 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include <linux/stat.h> #include <linux/timer.h> #include <linux/vexpress.h> +#include <linux/acpi.h>

#define SYS_ID 0x000 #define SYS_SW 0x004 @@ -512,10 +513,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id vexpress_sysreg_match[] = { {}, };

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI +static const struct acpi_device_id vexpress_sysreg_acpi_match[] = {

•   { "LINA0009", },
  

•   { }
  

+}; +#endif

• static struct platform_driver vexpress_sysreg_driver = { .driver = { .name = "vexpress-sysreg", .of_match_table = vexpress_sysreg_match,

•           .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(vexpress_sysreg_acpi_match),
    },
    .probe = vexpress_sysreg_probe,
  

  };