Hi Rhonda,
On 13/04/2023 02:01, Rhonda Cohen wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Are you in contact with FedEx? I see that they have tried to deliver once, and then it was rerouted without success. Can you provide the address and telephone number you gave to FedEx? Perhaps, I can help close this.
Thank you. I have been pinging FedEx for the last several business days. Today the locker company delivery timed out, so FedEx asked again how I'd like to receive the parcel. I asked for delivery to the home address again:
Piispanristi 2 A 86 02200 Espoo
My phone is +358469526397
However I do not think that additional intervention is required. Adding additional information can mess things for them. It happened once already:
Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:35): okay, as I see package was sent to lockerbox at 2nd of April Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:46): to be honest it should be already in lockerbox at 5th of April Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:58): you didn't recieved any sms with location and code? Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:11): No Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:57): And the tracking page visible to me shows: Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:58): Friday, 31/03/2023 Delay Rerouted to revised delivery address Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:06:23): but rerouted wasn't possible due of wrong phone number Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:06:33): correct phone number was provided for us at 02.04 Me (06/04/2023, 15:07:39): Hmm. How is that possible? I had a missed call and an SMS from FedEx on Friday, 31.03 Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:07:44): I think sender made mistake, so they send us correct phone number at the beginning of this week Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:18): becouse simply it depends on what sender procided, in fedex system are two tabs for number, one at package, second one is for notifications Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:29): I think sender just provided two different numbers Me (06/04/2023, 15:08:37): +358 469526397 Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:44): that was phone number provided firstly "5037249727" Me (06/04/2023, 15:09:04): Yes. That is my phone and I was contacted on this phone on Friday.
As you can see, the original phone was correct, then somebody (Lantronix?) sent them another phone ("for notifications"), which FedEx/lockers could not use to send me the additional info.
Detailed Tracking (fedex.com) https://www.fedex.com/fedextrack/?trknbr=521665246367&trkqual=2460019000~521665246367~FX
Since the shipment has already passed customs, I am assuming that you no longer need the commercial invoice. It is attached in case you do.
I think I wrote in one of emails that Commercial invoice is required by law. Customs can ask for one for the next 6 months.
Best regards,
**
*Rhonda Cohen*
she/her
**
+1 541-517-2768 mobile
rhonda.cohen@sightlineapplications.com mailto:rhonda.cohen@sightlineapplications.com
www.sightlineapplications.com http://www.sightlineapplications.com/
http://sightlineapplications.com/
*From:* Jordan Holt <jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com mailto:jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com> *Sent:* Friday, April 7, 2023 9:43 AM *To:* Rhonda Cohen <rhonda.cohen@sightlineapplications.com mailto:rhonda.cohen@sightlineapplications.com>; Steve Olson <steve.olson@sightlineapplications.com mailto:steve.olson@sightlineapplications.com> *Subject:* Fwd: [Sightlineapplications] Re: Low temperature GPU hang testing
Forwarding to Rhonda
Get Outlook for Android https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg
*From:*Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org mailto:dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> *Sent:* Friday, April 7, 2023 6:02:33 AM *To:* Steve Olson <steve.olson@sightlineapplications.com mailto:steve.olson@sightlineapplications.com> *Cc:* Kim Steiner <kim.steiner@sightlineapplications.com mailto:kim.steiner@sightlineapplications.com>; Jordan Holt <jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com mailto:jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com>; Paul Neuhardt <paul.neuhardt@linaro.org mailto:paul.neuhardt@linaro.org>; sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org mailto:sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org<sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org mailto:sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org> *Subject:* Re: [Sightlineapplications] Re: Low temperature GPU hang testing
Hi Steve,
On 07/04/2023 04:49, Steve Olson wrote:
Dmitry, did you get the board from lantronix yet?
No, I did not receive it yet. Here is a transcript with the chat with support person:
Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:35): okay, as I see package was sent to lockerbox at 2nd of April Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:46): to be honest it should be already in lockerbox at 5th of April Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:58): you didn't recieved any sms with location and code? Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:11): No Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:57): And the tracking page visible to me shows: Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:58): Friday, 31/03/2023 Delay Rerouted to revised delivery address Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:06:23): but rerouted wasn't possible due of wrong phone number Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:06:33): correct phone number was provided for us at 02.04 Me (06/04/2023, 15:07:39): Hmm. How is that possible? I had a missed call and an SMS from FedEx on Friday, 31.03 Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:07:44): I think sender made mistake, so they send us correct phone number at the beginning of this week Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:18): becouse simply it depends on what sender procided, in fedex system are two tabs for number, one at package, second one is for notifications Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:29): I think sender just provided two different numbers Me (06/04/2023, 15:08:37): +358 469526397 Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:44): that was phone number provided firstly "5037249727" Me (06/04/2023, 15:09:04): Yes. That is my phone and I was contacted on this phone on Friday. Me (06/04/2023, 15:09:32): ok. Anyway, how can we resolve this situation? Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:10:51): well, I will ask our colleagues from support team to reach lockerbox company and to push your package. I will also tell them to send notification about location at this number +358 469526397, okay? Me (06/04/2023, 15:11:05): Yes, this is fine. Thank you
Thanks,
Steve
On Apr 6, 2023, at 11:54 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org mailto:dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote:
On 06/04/2023 21:51, Kim Steiner wrote:
Hi Dmitry, This is the parameter file from the board that is having issues.
You can copy it to the /home/slroot/sl/bin folder on your 4000. It is a single cam0 configured as a testpattern 1080p image.
Ack, thanks
Can you try the link again? I changed permissions.
Yes, it works now.
Thanks, Kim -----Original Message----- From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
mailto:dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 11:31 AM To: Kim Steiner <kim.steiner@sightlineapplications.com
mailto:kim.steiner@sightlineapplications.com>
Cc: Jordan Holt <jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com
mailto:jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com>; Paul Neuhardt <paul.neuhardt@linaro.org mailto:paul.neuhardt@linaro.org>; sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org mailto:sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: Low temperature GPU hang testing
On 06/04/2023 20:56, Kim Steiner wrote: Hi Dmitry,
With the latest patch for 5.15, both boards that didn't boot up
now boot, but one of the two boards crashes when we run our software. Attached is the dmesg log.
This is interesting. I also noticed the following: [ 44.186437] qcom-camss a34000.camss: Failed to add VFE#0 to
power domain
[ 44.186515] qcom-camss a34000.camss: Failed to power up
pipeline: -22
[ 44.189179] qcom-camss a34000.camss: Failed to add VFE#0 to
power domain
[ 44.199654] qcom-camss a34000.camss: Failed to power up
pipeline: -22
So, some parts of the board might be underpowered. I will take a look, what can be causing this issue or how can we
cope with that. In the mean time, could you please describe, which camera is enabled on this board?
With the latest patch for 5.15, we observe that the CPU functions
(Analyze) is a little slower. We also observe that power usage has increased between 4.14 and 5.15:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UD6FofrJKZ_9W7rGWTkN-DyoVI9KXQxktE https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UD6FofrJKZ_9W7rGWTkN-DyoVI9KXQxktE
XY6eYpeUU/edit#bookmark=id.y65dtcn7w11x
I don't have access to this document.
Thanks, Kim
-----Original Message----- From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
mailto:dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 10:57 AM To: Kim Steiner <kim.steiner@sightlineapplications.com
mailto:kim.steiner@sightlineapplications.com>
Cc: Jordan Holt <jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com
mailto:jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com>; Paul Neuhardt
<paul.neuhardt@linaro.org mailto:paul.neuhardt@linaro.org>;
sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org mailto:sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: Low temperature GPU hang testing
Hi Kim,
On 05/04/2023 17:08, Kim Steiner wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
This was two weeks ago when I ran this, but I do not think so. Although we didn’t do any temp test in our freezer (room temp only), because we didn’t hear back from you on if this was correct.
Should we?
I think you should create a single patch for us to test because the last patch you sent us did not compile, so I’m wondering if the correct patch was sent to us. In that patch, this line didn’t
compile: dev_info(gpu:
"GPU setting to %ld\n", *freq);
Please give a series of tests to the attached patch. I'm interested in:
- speed bins for the boards that crashed when you tested the
previous version, check the following line in the dmesg:
[ 4.105174] adreno b00000.gpu: Detected speed bin 0
checking that GPU performance matches the expectations.
checking that the boards are stable in normal conditions and in
the fridge test.
Thank you for your testing!
-- With best wishes Dmitry
-- With best wishes Dmitry
-- With best wishes Dmitry
Sightlineapplications mailing list --
sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org mailto:sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
sightlineapplications-leave@lists.linaro.org mailto:sightlineapplications-leave@lists.linaro.org
-- With best wishes Dmitry