On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:10:41PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
For those that are very curious, there were recently two previous postings of these patches to the public eas-dev mailing list. Of interest in those threads is the discussion around using a utilization threadhold versus purely matching frequency to capacity utilization versus using a margin (as this series does):
https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/eas-dev/2015-April/000074.html https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/eas-dev/2015-April/000115.html
So why wasn't that done here? (and on linux-pm of course)