Hi,
On 18/09/16 00:17, hungyh wrote:
Hi Juri,
In the figure of "SCHEDFREQ governor", i noticed that there is one big drop (from 1000 to 200) for cpu capacity when the util_avg is maximum.
Right. First thing to consider is that the util_avg depicted there is PELT utilization signal, while SCHEDFREQ is driven by WALT utilization signal in this case. I'll try to over impose WALT signal and update the plot.
and no such big drop for other governor, is this one bug for sched_freq governor?
I don't think so. It might just be a plotting artifact (we usually have a few of them in this kind of plots). But, I'll collect more traces and see if I can replicate it.
Best,
- Juri
On 09/16/2016 09:15 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
Hi,
In preparation for a Connect LAS16 hacking sessions, I've been trying to compare schedfreq with schedutil with EAS on Hikey running Android 4.4. In the document below you can view some preliminary results of what I found. Please excuse the brevity; I'm sure way more comments would be needed to make the document more understandable, but I hope it's still useful and I wanted to share it as soon as possible. Please don't hesitate to ask for more information or clarifications (best is by commenting directly on the document, I think).
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tMb9yfJgaZmVANbbhTWwjLQLA2v5tj-_aTLXDeSu...
tl;dr;
- merging pain wasn't so bad
- schedutil relatively close to schedfreq and interactive (even if high percentiles seems to be quite off): perf is lower, but saving some energy
- schedutil driven by WALT generally improves figures (but not that much)
- it remains to see the amount of work required to put schedtune on top of schedutil
Best,
- Juri
eas-dev mailing list eas-dev@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/eas-dev