On 06/10/17 21:36, Thara Gopinath wrote:
Hello Dietmar,
On 10/05/2017 02:45 PM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
Hi Thara,
On 23/06/17 15:37, Thara Gopinath wrote:
[...]
This is what I had to do to apply this patch to the next EAS integration. Have a look and tell me if you spot any issues.
Thanks,
-- Dietmar
-- >8 --
From 1500a85a733af8590c1545928eb589e73a67de57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dietmar Eggemann dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:52:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Tweaking [PATCH V3] Per Sched domain over utilization into the next eas_int
These are the changes I did to integrate this into eas_int:
(1) Incorporating my v3 review comments. (2) Adaptations in update_sd_lb_stats() due to new mainline base.
I did not understand this change. But I guess you have some extra stuff in the intergration branch that I cannot see. Otherwise I am okay with the changes.
Thanks! Yes it's related to Peterz patch "sched/fair: Fix wake_affine() for !NUMA_BALANCING" which is currently part of tip/sched/core. We do use tip/sched/core for our eas integrations.
-- Dietmar