On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:07:23PM -0700, Andres Oportus wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Leo Yan leo.yan@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:25:15PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
Hi,
On 12/07/17 22:04, Zachariah Kennedy wrote:
Good day!
I have been following EAS development for sometime now. Currently, I have implemented EAS in my own personal kernel for the Oneplus 3. It was largely based on the work done for the pixel and I am happy to say that currently, I have gotten better performance and battery life compared to stock CAF with HMP.
These questions will be based on the ACK android-4.4 branch
My first question is regarding tunings for EAS. I have seen many different values thrown around for awhile but I was curious about what everyone close to the project is using for schedutil up/down_rate_limit. Currently the stock values are 1000 (for up and down). Is this still the case for those testing the newest EAS changes using schedutil?
In another email, Andres has pointed out the parameters. But I noticed Andres pointed to "sched-freq" governor, but you are using schedutil.
Note that this was on purpose, as a starting point for tuning.
Got it :)
[...]
Thanks, Leo Yan