On 11/22/2013 06:25 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:41 PM, al.stone@linaro.org wrote:
From: Al Stone al.stone@linaro.org
Modified #ifdef so that DMI is not used on ARM platforms which are currently implementing ACPI reduced HW mode.
It is really not allowed or is optional? There are various people that want DMI tables on ARM.
Rob
True. DMI is optional. I see it as orthogonal to reduced HW mode; I have to hope that when DMI patches are forthcoming they'll do the right thing here.
Is there a better way to do this in the #if ?
Signed-off-by: Al Stone al.stone@linaro.org
include/linux/dmi.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dmi.h b/include/linux/dmi.h index f820f0a..a03deb8 100644 --- a/include/linux/dmi.h +++ b/include/linux/dmi.h @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct dmi_device { void *device_data; /* Type specific data */ };
-#ifdef CONFIG_DMI +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMI) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE)
struct dmi_dev_onboard { struct dmi_device dev; -- 1.8.3.1
linaro-kernel mailing list linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel