Hi,
On 08/07/15 21:28, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
On 8 July 2015 at 16:05, Ashwin Chaugule ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org wrote:
On 8 July 2015 at 15:55, Rafael J. Wysocki rafael@kernel.org wrote:
Hi Ashwin,
[...]
Can you please just send the new version of the $subject patch alone for now?
Attached below. (hope that worked.)
Also I'm still unsure what the connection between _CST and CPPC is.
There isnt. But I'm missing where I've implied the dependency?
Perhaps the confusion is coming from the introduction of ACPI_CST in this file. I could leave it as it is and just separate out the ACPI_PSS bits. But I figured, while I'm at it, I'd introduce ACPI_CST, since we know the LPI stuff is coming up soon as a CST alternative anyway. So if you prefer, I can drop the CST bits and maybe Sudeep can address that as part of his LPI patchset?
Correct, I will handle it as a prerequisite for introducing _LPI support. I had posted an RFC long back, will revive those patches and repost them soon.
It's better to enable ACPI_PROCESSOR on ARM64 only after we have all these dependencies resolved. Until then we need to carry some patches locally for testing.
Regards, Sudeep