Hi Timur.
On 31 October 2015 at 04:37, Timur Tabi timur@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 10/30/2015 02:05 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
I was only asking why the interrupt was optional, and it seems per the spec it's expected to be handed to an agent at a higher exception level.
That implies that the OS should only care about WS0, assuming that I've understood correctly.
Yes, this my understand as well. Apologies if I didn't get that across.
Sorry for misunderstanding your meaning. maybe Linux don't need to handle WS1, but I am not sure if there is a hardware with WS1 interrupt we need to handle.
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.