On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:53PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:39:27 +0000 , Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:17:27AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Not only that, Sudeep has a patch to consolidate DT and ACPI SMP code, I am working on it, I do not think it should be a blocking point, patch coming asap on top of your series.
Well, I don't really want to merge the series without those patches so I do think it blocks the code from getting into mainline.
Really? It's a pretty minor duplication problem and it's been identified as something requiring refactoring to both the ACPI and DT code. It isn't at all dangerous. Why is this a blocking point?
Because I don't really see a valid excuse not to get this right first time around. Lorenzo already has patches on top, so we just need a co-ordinated review effort.
I wouldn't accept another patch series that needed minor rework (which by its very nature is easily addressed), so why should ACPI be treated any differently?
Will