Hi Andrea,
On 22/02/14 17:42, Andrea Gallo wrote:
Catalin, Sudeep,
Hanjun, Al, Graeme and the whole team discuss and review all such patches on the linaro-acpi list before sending them out.
Yes I have subscribed to that list and even interacted couple of times. Only problem I see there is that the patches posted there are mostly based on Linaro tree which has whole lot of other changes rather than mainline.
Would it make sense to discuss all these points on such list instead of creating such confusion with the broader linux-acpi or lkml? Even more as Sudeep seems working deeply on ACPI now, it would be very beneficial.
Yes, but these reworked patches were not posted just on linaro-acpi list. I have no problem reviewing on any list as long as its based on mainline. I have started looking at the linaro tree, but it has several other changes, so bit hard for me to follow now as it has several months of ACPI work by Linaro.
We would welcome all your early comments, as already mentioned months ago.
No problem, I have several months of work to follow, will take some time. I can easily understand small changes based on mainline and hence reviewing them.
At Connect we will have ACPI sessions on power management, clocks and regulators and upstreaming.
Yes I will make sure to attend them so that I get complete picture and easy for me to ramp up.
I expect that by the end of Connect we have a clear well defined list of who you want to ack, who has already ack'ed, who not and why. I also want to agree on who owns ACPI on ARM, as you have raised this question already few times. I do not care who, I care that we do not raise such topics in front of Rafael, as Intel loves just too much to read that the ARM camp is in total confusion.
Ok, agreed.
Regards, Sudeep