On 01/29/2015 06:11 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Sorry Jon but statements like this make me wonder whether we should simply let the whole ARM ACPI be an out of tree distro business. We spend a long time discussing OS-agnostic firmware implementation, planning mini-summits, just to get certain Linux distro representative stating that the kernel-firmware interface we discuss here only matters for those planning to follow upstream. Certain Linux distros will play by other rules.
Oh, don't take it that way - I just mean that if someone needs a different ACPI always on, they can do that separately. I support your position on upstream at this time! :)
Jon.