On 27/08/15 14:51, Fu Wei wrote:
Hi Thomas, Hanjun
On 27 August 2015 at 21:40, Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Hanjun Guo wrote:
If that is ok with you, we will introduce similar DECLARE_ thing for clock declare.
Yes.
Thanks
Or we can drop this patch from this patch set, and clean up this patch when the ACPI_DECLARE() infrastructure is ready for upstream.
Works either way. I just noticed that hard coded init thing and decided to rant about it :)
OK, good idea, this patch will be improve by DECLARE_ thing, then upstream. drop this from this patchset.
Great thanks for your help
You probably want to keep an eye on this:
https://lwn.net/Articles/657238/
which implements the necessary infrastructure. I'd appreciate if you could give it a go to find out if it works for you.
Thanks,
M.