On 2013-7-23 23:57, Al Stone wrote:
On 07/23/2013 07:17 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
Hi Hanjun,
Yes this looks like a good candidate to send straight to upstream. Just keep linaro-acpi list in the CC so we can keep track of comments.
OK, I will refactor the patch and send to upstream. I will keep all of you and the linaro-acpi in CC list.
Thanks
Graeme
On 23/07/13 14:02, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This patch is ACPI independent, can we send to upstream first?
Absolutely agreed -- independent patches should just go upstream first with a polite CC to us.
Note, too, that using the MPIDR registers for this sort of work was brought up repeatedly in discussing ACPI on ARM, so it seems like great minds think alike :)...
Great, so nice to hear that. I think MPIDR registers are necessary for APIC ID in MADT tables too.
Thanks Hanjun