On 27 January 2016 at 05:36, Itaru Kitayama itaru.kitayama@riken.jp wrote:
Hi Ricardo, I've seen that the topic-apm boots fine with acpi=force. Thanks.
Graeme, I assume you can not take those do-not-upstream patches even if that is needed for Mustang, correct?
Hi Itaru,
Now ACPI core is upstream I do not plan to carry any hardware enablement patches.
Graeme
Itaru
On 1/27/16 10:03 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Ricardo Salveti ricardo.salveti@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Itaru Kitayama itaru.kitayama@riken.jp wrote:
Thank you Ricardo for jumping in. FWIW, here's the Mustang F/W I am using in the Linaro Server Lab.
TianoCore 1.1.0 UEFI 2.4.0 Nov 24 2015 13:21:07 CPU: APM ARM 64-bit Potenza Rev B0 2400MHz PCP 2400MHz 32 KB ICACHE, 32 KB DCACHE SOC 2000MHz IOBAXI 400MHz AXI 250MHz AHB 200MHz GFC 125MHz Board: X-Gene Mustang Board Slimpro FW: Ver: 2.4 (build 01.15.23.00 2015/11/24) PMD: 970 mV SOC: 950 mV
Thanks, the one I'm using is a bit older, let me find out how to get this to use the latest firmware.
Tested with the same firmware now, and had the same issue, but we're in sync at least now.
As a test, I added the fedora specific patches at https://github.com/rsalveti/linux/commits/topic-apm (on top of the 96boards reference kernel, which is based on the leg/acpi kernel), and it worked fine (tested on a 4.4 based kernel).
I know the CentOS kernel also got some extra patches (including a mailbox driver,
https://git.centos.org/tree/sig-altarch%21kernel.git/9933f223293366d995fb475...), so you might want to check that as well.
Cheers,