On 09/12/2013 10:55 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
As a rule its better not to break string (quoted inside "") in a print statement even if it crosses 80 column boundary as that may introduce unwanted bugs and so this patch rewrites one of the print statements..
Ok, if that is the convention, then so be it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 28477eb..31f7845 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1192,8 +1192,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev, unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
if (!frozen) {
pr_debug("%s: policy Kobject moved to cpu: %d ""from: %d\n",__func__, new_cpu, cpu);
pr_debug("%s: policy Kobject moved to cpu: %d from: %d\n",__func__, new_cpu, cpu); }