linaro-kernel March 2011

linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org

21 participants
50 discussions

by Nicolas Pitre

* Discussion to generalize the maintenance process of kernel branches > for the periodic Linaro releases. This still needs documenting in the > wiki. > > * Merged a set of patches put together by Anand Gadiyar to add display > support to the PandaBoard. > > * Merged the following additional patches: > > * d983450 cpufreq: Add documentation for sampling_down_factor > * 054fcd5 ARM: S5P: Fix end address in memory resource information for UART devices > * bf47520 ARM: make SWP emulation explicit on !CPU_USE_DOMAINS > * 459967a ARM: fixup SMP alternatives in modules > * 7144fbc ARM: 6654/1: perf/oprofile: fix off-by-one in stack check > * 067dfdf ARM: 6659/1: Thumb-2: Make CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT depend on !CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL > * cc0f308 ARM: 6656/1: hw_breakpoint: avoid UNPREDICTABLE behaviour when reading DBGDSCR > * 40ef21c ARM: 6657/1: hw_breakpoint: fix ptrace breakpoint advertising on unsupported arch > * 9e97118 ARM: ptrace: remove single-step emulation code > == Upstream oriented activities == * Review of Arnd Bergmann's flash card article for LWN. * Incorporation of feedback to the patch adding Thumb2 support to the P2V branch. * Another look at the Thumb-2 compatibility fixes for OMAP from Dave Martin. * Review of a patch series adding support for SDHCI v3.00. * Posted patches: * Rework of the kernel decompressor code to improve efficiency * Removal of the 4x expansion presumption while decompressing the kernel * kprobes insn decoding fix * Ignore mdesc->boot_params if out of range * Fold lookup_machine_type() into setup_machine() == Linaro kernel activities == * Looked at some bugs: * Bug 660811 * Bug 720055 * Merged 2.6.37.1 into linaro-2.6.37 * Merged Dave Martin's Thumb2 compatibility patches for OMAP. * Merged core ARM ffixes from RMK. * Merged OMAP fixes from Tony Lindgren. * Opened up the linaro-2.6.38 branch. Nicolas

12 years, 3 months

[PATCH 0/6] ARM device tree support improvements

by Grant Likely

Hi Jerry & Wolfgang, The following series fixes a bug in the device tree code and eliminates the CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT dependency on CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ. It also adds parsing of the reserved mem regions so that U-Boot doesn't decide to use a regions set aside for another purpose. Finally, the last patch adds CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT to a bunch of boards. I'm not expecting the last patch to be picked up in mainline (yet), but it will be picked up into the Linaro tree for the 11.05 release. John, this same series applies cleanly on the linaro-stable u-boot tree. Can you pick them up please? Or would you prefer me to send you a pull request? g. --- Grant Likely (6): Stop passing around bootmem_base value. Default to bootm_size() when CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ is not defined Remove device tree booting dependency on CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ Fix off-by-one error in passing initrd end address via device tree Respect memreserve regions specified in the device tree Add CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT to more boards. README | 16 ++++++++- arch/arm/lib/bootm.c | 5 ++- arch/m68k/lib/bootm.c | 7 +--- arch/powerpc/lib/bootm.c | 19 +++++----- common/cmd_bootm.c | 7 ++-- common/fdt_support.c | 2 + common/image.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- include/configs/ca9x4_ct_vxp.h | 2 + include/configs/devkit8000.h | 2 + include/configs/efikamx.h | 2 + include/configs/igep0020.h | 2 + include/configs/igep0030.h | 2 + include/configs/mx51evk.h | 2 + include/configs/mx53evk.h | 2 + include/configs/omap3_beagle.h | 7 ---- include/configs/omap3_overo.h | 2 + include/configs/omap3_pandora.h | 2 + include/configs/omap3_sdp3430.h | 2 + include/configs/omap3_zoom1.h | 2 + include/configs/omap3_zoom2.h | 2 + include/configs/omap4_panda.h | 2 + include/configs/omap4_sdp4430.h | 2 + include/configs/tegra2-common.h | 1 + include/image.h | 10 +++-- 24 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) -- Signature

12 years, 12 months

[PATCH] arm/dt: Add basic device tree support for smdkv310 board

by Thomas Abraham

Enable basic device tree support for Exynos4 smdkv310 board. Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham(a)linaro.org> --- .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/smdkv310.txt | 14 +++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c | 6 ++++ 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/smdkv310.txt create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/smdkv310.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/smdkv310.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ee9a220 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/smdkv310.txt @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +* Samsung's Exynos4 S5PV310 SoC based SMDKV310 eval board * + +SMDKV310 eval board is based on S5PV310 SoC which belongs to Samsung's Exynos4 +family of application processors. + +* Root node + + The root node describes the smdkv310 eval board. + + Required Properties: + + - compatible : It should be one or more of the following. + (a) "samsung,smdkv310" - for Samsung's SMDKV310 eval board. + (b) "samsung,s5pv310" - for boards based on S5PV310 SoC. diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9f27664 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +/dts-v1/; + +/ { + model = "Samsung Exynos4 SMDKV310 eval board"; + compatible = "samsung,smdkv310","samsung,s5pv310"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + cpus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + cpu@0{ + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9"; + reg = <0x0>; + }; + + cpu@1 { + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9"; + reg = <0x1>; + }; + }; + + memory { + device_type = "memory"; + reg = <0x40000000 0x08000000>; + }; + + chosen { + }; +}; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c index 1526764..08bcc55 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c @@ -237,6 +237,11 @@ static void __init smdkv310_machine_init(void) platform_add_devices(smdkv310_devices, ARRAY_SIZE(smdkv310_devices)); } +static char const *smdkv310_dt_compat[] __initdata = { + "samsung,smdkv310", + NULL +}; + MACHINE_START(SMDKV310, "SMDKV310") /* Maintainer: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim(a)samsung.com> */ /* Maintainer: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn(a)samsung.com> */ @@ -245,4 +250,5 @@ MACHINE_START(SMDKV310, "SMDKV310") .map_io = smdkv310_map_io, .init_machine = smdkv310_machine_init, .timer = &exynos4_timer, + .dt_compat = smdkv310_dt_compat, MACHINE_END -- 1.6.6.rc2

13 years

[git pull] Devicetree support for rebuild linaro 2.6.38 branch

by Grant Likely

Hi Nicolas, Here are the device tree changes for 2.6.38 rebased onto your new branch. I had to rebase instead of just asking you to pull directly since I have a number of patches in my test tree that are merged in a different form in your tree. For those of you working on DT support for the 11.05 release, please test against this branch and make sure everything is still working for you. g. The following changes since commit f302d2ec52bfb0d9ae2bb7fbff957f3f6ea71f45: ARM: 6826/1: Merge v6 and v7 DEBUG_LL DCC support (2011-03-28 14:45:57 -0400) are available in the git repository at: git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 devicetree/arm-linaro-2.6.38-rebuilt Grant Likely (15): driver-core: remove conditionals around devicetree pointers dt: Refactor of_platform_bus_probe() dt: protect against NULL matches passed to of_match_node() dt: eliminate OF_NO_DEEP_PROBE and test for NULL match table dt: add of_platform_populate() for creating device from the device tree dt: add of_platform_prepare() to match nodes with static platform_devices tty/serial: Relax the device_type restriction from of_serial arm/dt: Make __vet_atags also accept a dtb image arm/dt: consolidate atags setup into setup_machine_atags arm/dt: probe for platforms via the device tree arm/dt: Basic versatile devicetree support arm/dt: Basic tegra devicetree support arm/dt: Add Pandaboard devicetree support dt: add documentation of ARM dt boot interface arm/dt: Add dt machine definition Jeremy Kerr (1): arm/dt: Allow CONFIG_OF on ARM Jon Medhurst (1): arm/dt: Add basic device tree support for Beagleboad Rob Herring (1): arm/dt: Add dtb make rule Thomas Abraham (1): dt/arm: Add basic device tree support for smdkv310 board Documentation/arm/Booting | 33 ++- Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.txt | 44 +++- arch/arm/Kconfig | 7 + arch/arm/Makefile | 3 + arch/arm/boot/Makefile | 4 + arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts | 31 ++ arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts | 7 + arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda.dts | 11 + arch/arm/boot/dts/skeleton.dtsi | 13 + arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts | 7 + arch/arm/boot/dts/versatile-ab.dts | 7 + arch/arm/boot/dts/versatile-pb.dts | 7 + arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h | 18 ++ arch/arm/include/asm/prom.h | 37 +++ arch/arm/include/asm/setup.h | 5 + arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c | 147 ++++++++++ arch/arm/kernel/head-common.S | 24 ++- arch/arm/kernel/head.S | 8 +- arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 97 ++++--- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c | 6 + arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c | 6 + arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c | 6 + arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-harmony.c | 6 + arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c | 1 + arch/arm/mach-versatile/versatile_ab.c | 6 + arch/arm/mach-versatile/versatile_pb.c | 6 + arch/arm/mm/init.c | 11 + arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_common.c | 10 +- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c | 14 +- drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 2 - drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c | 4 - drivers/net/ethoc.c | 8 +- drivers/of/address.c | 14 + drivers/of/base.c | 3 + drivers/of/platform.c | 347 +++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c | 2 - drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi_pci.c | 2 - drivers/spi/xilinx_spi.c | 6 - drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c | 18 +- include/linux/device.h | 7 +- include/linux/i2c.h | 2 - include/linux/of.h | 4 +- include/linux/of_address.h | 1 + include/linux/of_platform.h | 8 +- 45 files changed, 850 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-) create mode 100755 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/skeleton.dtsi create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/versatile-ab.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/versatile-pb.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/prom.h create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.

13 years

[PATCH] dt/arm: Add basic device tree support for smdkv310 board

by Thomas Abraham

Enable basic device tree support for Exynos4 smdkv310 board. Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham(a)linaro.org> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c | 6 ++++++ 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100755 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts new file mode 100755 index 0000000..9f27664 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4-smdkv310.dts @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +/dts-v1/; + +/ { + model = "Samsung Exynos4 SMDKV310 eval board"; + compatible = "samsung,smdkv310","samsung,s5pv310"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + cpus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + cpu@0{ + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9"; + reg = <0x0>; + }; + + cpu@1 { + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9"; + reg = <0x1>; + }; + }; + + memory { + device_type = "memory"; + reg = <0x40000000 0x08000000>; + }; + + chosen { + }; +}; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig index a021b52..78f5924 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ config MACH_SMDKV310 select EXYNOS4_SETUP_I2C1 select EXYNOS4_SETUP_KEYPAD select EXYNOS4_SETUP_SDHCI + select USE_OF help Machine support for Samsung SMDKV310 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c index 88e0275..f6dc8df 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c @@ -237,6 +237,11 @@ static void __init smdkv310_machine_init(void) platform_add_devices(smdkv310_devices, ARRAY_SIZE(smdkv310_devices)); } +static char const *smdkv310_dt_compat[] = { + "samsung,smdkv310", + NULL +}; + MACHINE_START(SMDKV310, "SMDKV310") /* Maintainer: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim(a)samsung.com> */ /* Maintainer: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn(a)samsung.com> */ @@ -245,4 +250,5 @@ MACHINE_START(SMDKV310, "SMDKV310") .map_io = smdkv310_map_io, .init_machine = smdkv310_machine_init, .timer = &exynos4_timer, + .dt_compat = smdkv310_dt_compat, MACHINE_END -- 1.6.6.rc2

13 years

[PATCH v2] arm/dt: Add mx51 babbage devicetree support

by Shawn Guo

Enable basic device tree support on mx51 babbage Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo(a)linaro.org> --- Changes since v1: * rename babbage.dts to mx51-babbage.dts for better aligning with other dts naming arch/arm/boot/dts/mx51-babbage.dts | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/mx51-babbage.dts diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mx51-babbage.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mx51-babbage.dts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..71410b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mx51-babbage.dts @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +/dts-v1/; + +/ { + model = "Freescale i.MX51 Babbage"; + compatible = "fsl,mx51-babbage"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + aliases { + }; + + memory { + device_type = "memory"; + reg = <0x90000000 0x20000000>; + }; + + chosen { + }; +}; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c index b2ecd19..30b92ca 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c @@ -399,6 +399,11 @@ static struct sys_timer mx51_babbage_timer = { .init = mx51_babbage_timer_init, }; +static const char *mx51_babbage_dt_match[] __initdata = { + "fsl,mx51-babbage", + NULL +}; + MACHINE_START(MX51_BABBAGE, "Freescale MX51 Babbage Board") /* Maintainer: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria(a)canonical.com> */ .boot_params = MX51_PHYS_OFFSET + 0x100, @@ -407,4 +412,5 @@ MACHINE_START(MX51_BABBAGE, "Freescale MX51 Babbage Board") .init_irq = mx51_init_irq, .timer = &mx51_babbage_timer, .init_machine = mx51_babbage_init, + .dt_compat = mx51_babbage_dt_match, MACHINE_END -- 1.7.1

13 years

[PATCH RESEND] arm/dt: Add mx51 babbage devicetree support

by Shawn Guo

Enable basic device tree support on mx51 babbage Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo(a)linaro.org> --- mx51_babbage_dt_match was put at an improper place, so resend the patch to fix it. arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..71410b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +/dts-v1/; + +/ { + model = "Freescale i.MX51 Babbage"; + compatible = "fsl,mx51-babbage"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + aliases { + }; + + memory { + device_type = "memory"; + reg = <0x90000000 0x20000000>; + }; + + chosen { + }; +}; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c index b2ecd19..30b92ca 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c @@ -399,6 +399,11 @@ static struct sys_timer mx51_babbage_timer = { .init = mx51_babbage_timer_init, }; +static const char *mx51_babbage_dt_match[] __initdata = { + "fsl,mx51-babbage", + NULL +}; + MACHINE_START(MX51_BABBAGE, "Freescale MX51 Babbage Board") /* Maintainer: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria(a)canonical.com> */ .boot_params = MX51_PHYS_OFFSET + 0x100, @@ -407,4 +412,5 @@ MACHINE_START(MX51_BABBAGE, "Freescale MX51 Babbage Board") .init_irq = mx51_init_irq, .timer = &mx51_babbage_timer, .init_machine = mx51_babbage_init, + .dt_compat = mx51_babbage_dt_match, MACHINE_END -- 1.7.1

13 years

[PATCH] arm/dt: Add mx51 babbage devicetree support

by Shawn Guo

Enable basic device tree support on mx51 babbage Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo(a)linaro.org> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..71410b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +/dts-v1/; + +/ { + model = "Freescale i.MX51 Babbage"; + compatible = "fsl,mx51-babbage"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + aliases { + }; + + memory { + device_type = "memory"; + reg = <0x90000000 0x20000000>; + }; + + chosen { + }; +}; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c index b2ecd19..106b14e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_babbage.c @@ -54,6 +54,11 @@ #define MX51_USB_PLL_DIV_19_2_MHZ 0x01 #define MX51_USB_PLL_DIV_24_MHZ 0x02 +static const char *mx51_babbage_dt_match[] __initdata = { + "fsl,mx51-babbage", + NULL +}; + static struct gpio_keys_button babbage_buttons[] = { { .gpio = BABBAGE_POWER_KEY, @@ -407,4 +412,5 @@ MACHINE_START(MX51_BABBAGE, "Freescale MX51 Babbage Board") .init_irq = mx51_init_irq, .timer = &mx51_babbage_timer, .init_machine = mx51_babbage_init, + .dt_compat = mx51_babbage_dt_match, MACHINE_END -- 1.7.1

13 years

Status of the linaro-2.6.38 kernel

by Nicolas Pitre

Hello everyone, As I've been working on the integration of the latest developments and fixes from upstream into the linaro-2.6.38 kernel lately, it became quickly evident that major merge conflicts were to be expected. The problem stems from the fact that we opened the 2.6.38 branch early i.e. around the 2.6.38-rc5 kernel. Many patches that were merged into the Linaro kernel have been subsequently modified by their respective maintainers until they were merged upstream, meaning that what we have now in mainline is different from what the Linaro kernel tree has. This creates several issues: - It is hard to verify that what is in the Linaro tree is actually the latest and the best version of a patch. - Merging additional fixes from upstream often ends up in merge conflicts requiring manual resolution, sometimes non-trivial ones, which is in itself a bug hazard. - People wanting to contribute patches to the Linaro kernel potentially have to create a different patch than what they would submit upstream. Given those issues, I decided to rebuild the linaro-2.6.38 branch from scratch to see where that would bring me. And as could be expected, the result looks nicer and it is much easier to work with than the current tree. For example, this allowed me to merge the latest OMAP support from mainline as is, including the latest fixes, without any need for backport work nor major conflict resolution. Another advantage is that the commit SHA1 references are now identical in most cases to what can be found into mainline. So... my question is: should we switch to this rebuilt tree or not? There are drawbacks with such a move of course: - All the testing done so far would be void. This is however not as bad as this may look as the rebuilt kernel contains fixes for existing bugs in the current tree, and the rebuilt kernel is using patches that have and still are being tested by a wider community. - I didn't forward port a couple series of patches that are available in the current Linaro tree and not in mainline yet, including: * DT support (Grant Likely) * DVFS and PM for OMAP (Vishwanath Sripathy, Vishwanath BS) * Some ux500 fixups (Linus Walleij) * clock debug information (Yong Shen) * Samsung CPUIDLE (Amit Kachhap) So I would prefer if the people responsible for those patches did resubmit their patches once they apply to the new tree (that should be even easier now to apply patches that were meant for mainline). - The history of the rebuilt tree is obviously different from the current tree's. This means special care when updating to the new tree with Git. But overall I think there are more advantages than disadvantages for such a move. What other people think? The current rebuilt tree can be seen at: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.38.git;a=shortlog;h=… or obtained from: git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.38.git (the "rebuilt" branch) Nicolas

13 years

[ACTIVITY] (Shawn Guo) 2011-03-21 - 2011-03-25

by Shawn Guo

== Device Tree == * Squash sdhci-pltfm-driver-self-registration series which becomes one patch of sdhci-pltfm&OF-driver-consolidation series * Sent a fec dt patch to fix build failure with pure non-dt kernel * Tested dtb-append patch v3 from John Bonesio on mx51 babbage and found non-dt kernel works fine, but dt kernel fails == Misc == * Reviewed and tested fec improving patch from Lothar -- Regards, Shawn

13 years

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

linaro-kernel March 2011