Hi Marc,
On 26 April 2013 15:17, Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com wrote:
Hi Anup,
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:51:50 +0530, Anup Patel anup.patel@linaro.org wrote:
The arch_timer irq numbers (or PPI number) are implementation dependent so, the host virtual timer irq number can be different from guest
virtual
timer irq number.
This patch ensures that host virtual timer irq number is read from DTB
and
guest virtual timer irq is determined based on guest vcpu target type.
One word about communication first: Please keep me cc-ed on anything that has to do with with vgic and timers. I'm the author of the code, I intend to look after it, and this has some direct impact on the arm64 port. Thank you.
Sure, I'll CC you for arch_timer and vgic changes.
Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar pranavkumar@linaro.org
Who is the author of this patch? You or Pranavkumar? If it is you, then your Signed-off line should be present. If not, then there should be a "From:" line at the beginning of the commit message.
I really thought "From" is implicit and the sender of the email is the author.
Pranav has co-authored this patch hence his signed-off by him.
Anyways, I will put signed-off by me and Pranav both.
arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/arm/kvm/arch_timer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- arch/arm/kvm/guest.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 57cb786..cdc0551 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu; u32 *kvm_vcpu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num, u32 mode); int kvm_target_cpu(void); +struct kvm_irq_level *kvm_target_timer_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void kvm_reset_coprocs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arch_timer.c index 49a7516..521cdb9 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arch_timer.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arch_timer.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
static struct timecounter *timecounter; static struct workqueue_struct *wqueue; -static struct kvm_irq_level timer_irq = { +static struct kvm_irq_level host_timer_irq = { .level = 1, };
@@ -65,10 +65,21 @@ static void kvm_timer_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu)
{ struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
/** The vcpu timer irq number cannont be determined in* kvm_timer_vcpu_init() because it is called much before* kvm_vcpu_set_target(). To handle this, we determin* vcpu timer irq number when we inject the vcpu timer irq* first time.*/if (!timer->irq) {timer->irq = kvm_target_timer_irq(vcpu);}Please, not yet another of these. We already have kvm_vcpu_first_run_init that collects all the "do this on first vcpu run" kind of thing.
timer->cntv_ctl |= ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_MASK; kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
vcpu->arch.timer_cpu.irq->irq,vcpu->arch.timer_cpu.irq->level);
timer->irq->irq,timer->irq->level);}
static irqreturn_t kvm_arch_timer_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) @@ -163,12 +174,12 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) INIT_WORK(&timer->expired, kvm_timer_inject_irq_work); hrtimer_init(&timer->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); timer->timer.function = kvm_timer_expire;
timer->irq = &timer_irq;
timer->irq = NULL;}
So with the above in mind, how about moving the call to kvm_timer_vcpu_init into kvm_vcpu_first_run_init, and do the init once and for all?
Yes, this would be even more cleaner.
static void kvm_timer_init_interrupt(void *info) {
enable_percpu_irq(timer_irq.irq, 0);
enable_percpu_irq(host_timer_irq.irq, 0);}
@@ -182,7 +193,7 @@ static int kvm_timer_cpu_notify(struct
notifier_block
*self, break; case CPU_DYING: case CPU_DYING_FROZEN:
disable_percpu_irq(timer_irq.irq);
disable_percpu_irq(host_timer_irq.irq); break; }@@ -230,7 +241,7 @@ int kvm_timer_hyp_init(void) goto out; }
timer_irq.irq = ppi;
host_timer_irq.irq = ppi; err = register_cpu_notifier(&kvm_timer_cpu_nb); if (err) {diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c index 152d036..d87b05d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = { { NULL } };
+struct kvm_irq_level target_default_timer_irq = {
.irq = 27,.level = 1,+};
Don't call it default, as it is A15 specific. Also make it static.
Sure, will update this.
int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return 0; @@ -197,6 +202,16 @@ int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void) } }
+struct kvm_irq_level *kvm_target_timer_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{
switch (vcpu->arch.target) {case KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A15:return &target_default_timer_irq;default:return NULL;And what do you do once you've returned NULL? Let the kernel crash? Also, we now have a second path that tests the target (the first one is in reset.c
Actually, this function is expected to be called as part of VCPU init and if we get NULL then we should fail the VCPU init.
Actually, scratch all the above, and move the irq assignment to reset.c. It is probably the best place for it.
Sure, I will try this and send another patch which addresses all comments.
Thanks,
M.-- Fast, cheap, reliable. Pick two.
Regards, Anup