On 06/10/2013 02:38 AM, Colin Cross wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
On Friday 07 June 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig index f49cd51..831e89e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ config ARCH_OMAP4 depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 select ARCH_HAS_OPP
select ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED if SMP
select ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED if (SMP && CPU_IDLE)I remember Colin mentioning about above dependency is taken care already in design [1]
It's a matter of how it gets represented in Kconfig. Right now the ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED symbol has a dependency on CPU_IDLE, so we cannot select it if CPU_IDLE is not set (or get a build time warning).
I originally suggested removing the dependency, but Daniel preferred to leave it there as an explicit dependency so it is required to do this change instead.
ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED should never have been moved inside "if CPU_IDLE". It was designed to be outside the CPU_IDLE dependency so archs could select it without having to know about its dependencies. Just move it back outside if CPU_IDLE in drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig and you won't have to mess with every arch that uses it. If CPU_IDLE=n none if it will get compiled, so there is no need for the extra dependency.
I don't really like implicit dependencies and IMO showing them in the Kconfig makes the life easier for someone who wants to understand what gets compiled or not when reading the code. Even if that means to modify a couple of Kconfig.
It is a preference and thus I don't have a strong opinion on that, so if nobody is against I will resend a patch moving this option out of the CPU_IDLE dep.
Thanks -- Daniel