On 10 August 2013 12:14, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used by cpufreq drivers then.
This patch uses these generic routines for this driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
My patch was wrong.. It was based on the assumption that everybody who had implemented a .target() also implements a frequency table and exposes it.. And the generic routines I have exposed depend on that frequency table. And this cpufreq driver doesn't expose that freq table...
And so this patch is dropped :(