On 18 July 2014 09:47, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
Before I apply anything in this area, I need a clear statement from the ARM people as a group on what the approach is going to be.
@Rafael: The only patch which has blocked this set is:
cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0
This is about finding which CPUs share clock line..
Other patches are sort of independent of this one and cpufreq-cpu0 would continue to work for existing platforms if we apply these patches.
I was wondering if you would like to apply other patches leaving this one? I will then rebase stuff again and send non-controversial patches for 3.17. So, that we get something in 3.17 and the last change can be merged during rc's as well once we finalize on bindings..
Mike/Rob/Stephen: I believe Atleast three of you should express your views now :)
Any idea on how can we get some temporary solution for 3.17 as we didn't conclude anything yet on bindings ?
-- viresh