On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 05:13:16PM +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
Sorry for late reply,
+Lorenzo
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 18:04 +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:56:07AM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
Today's -next fails to build an arm allmodconfig due to:
arm-allmodconfig ../drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c:485:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_register_host_bridge' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
caused by eaf3023b0498a (PCI: mediatek: Add MediaTek PCIe host controller support).
Hi Lorenzo,
I picked up your changes and had some modifications like what you did for other platforms:
9f8e3a5 PCI: Add devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge() interface 35a1a84 PCI: Add pci_free_host_bridge() interface e33aafd PCI: Initialize bridge release function at bridge allocation
...and it looks Okay.
I have also noticed that you continue sending patches for other platforms but I have not yet had a look in detail. I'm quite busy these days and don't have time to dig it, hence it is becoming a little unmanageable for me.
If it is unmanageable you don't add yourself as a maintainer of that PCI host bridge driver, you know, we are all busy.
Your driver in the PCI tree as it stands contains already two bugs:
1) It leaks memory on the probe failure path 2) pci_fixup_irqs() is broken on configurations with multiple host bridges
And we keep copy'n'pasting that code.
Did you have a chance to send the same patches for MediaTek? I appreciate that and I can help to test it on our platforms.
No, how could I have sent them ? It is not upstream and it is a separate branch in the PCI tree. As I mentioned in another thread it is probably best to drop my pci_fixup_irqs() removal patches since it is impossible to work on them without a stable branch to apply them against, in the interim we keep adding PCI host bridges that use the wrong interfaces by copy'n'pasting code that I have been trying to remove.
I think the best solution is to repost my series when v4.13-rc1 appears and ask all new crop of host bridge drivers to rebase against it.
I won't be able to follow mailing lists till end of next week, which is bad timing.
Bjorn, is the plan above ok ? Please let me know how you want to proceed.
Thanks, Lorenzo