18 Mar
2013
18 Mar
'13
6:11 p.m.
On 03/18/2013 09:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 03/13/2013 05:42 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Rob,
On 03/13/2013 03:39 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
I fail to see what the hack is. The order of interrupt properties must be defined by the binding. interrupt-names is auxiliary data and must not be required by an OS.
Is that true for all foo-names properties, or only for interrupt-names? I was under the impression that foo-names was specifically invented so that the order of the entries didn't matter, and instead they could be requested by name.