On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 08:13:05PM +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
On 03/28/2014 01:28 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:26:34PM +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
On 02/20/2014 12:59 AM, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
Hi Russell,
Is there any issue with this pull request? Should I do something to get it pulled?
There's nothing wrong, apart from me being far too busy hacking on really crap code to care about reading much email - which means that lots of email simply just gets buried and lost.
There is now a problem with this pull - it conflicts very badly with Dave Long's uprobes code, which I've already pulled, so much so that I'm not happy to do the conflict resolution since I know nothing about this code, and it's a feature I don't make any use of.
I've rebased it onto your for-next branch. Kprobes are functional in LE and BE. I'll send an updated pull request after verifying uprobes.
That's not going to work. for-next is an unstable branch - all the merge commits there get regenerated on a fairly regular basis.
A better solution would be to base your patches on top of Dave Long's changes, which can be found at
git://git.linaro.org/people/dave.long/linux uprobes-v7
and should have an ID of c7edc9e326d5.