On 11/19/2013 09:29 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 11/19/2013 02:19 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
[ ...]
I don't think the assumption that ARM systems rarely have many tasks running is generally valid. Smartphones do occasionally use all available cpus and ARM systems are used in many other segments.
I only has a panda board in hands, and don't know which benchmark are good for the testing. The key of this patch effect is testing. Anyone like to give a hand on this?
Hi Alex,
I have some hardware here:
- 2 x E5345 (bi xeon quad core)
- tc2 vexpress
- i5
I can give you a hand for testing but as I am very busy on some other stuff, I will let you define the tests to run and the scenario if it is ok for you.
Daniel, Thank you so much for generous help!
I upload my patchset: a78df1a sched: clean up source_load function 0c6f389 sched: remove rq->cpu_load[load_idx] 95da4d4 sched: remove load_idx effect 948aaec sched: remove unused variable in sched_domain
on git@github.com:alexshi/power-scheduling.git no-load-idx This tree also added into intel's 0day kernel testing. so we don't need care the x86 now. Intel will do testing for the tree.
I am going to test hackbench,sysbench, tbench/dbench on my ubuntu-panda. What you prefer benchmarks?