On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Sunday, October 19, 2014 11:30:26 AM Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Hello Rafael,
As you requested, here is a new version of the cpufreq-dt patches, rebased on top of the latest Linus tree (52d589a01d4545ce1dc5c3892bb8c7b55edfe714 as I write this).
Compared to version 2:
Rebased on top of latest Linus tree.
Removed PATCH 3/4, which is meant to go through the mvebu maintainer tree. I'll push it post-rc1.
Added Acked-by tags from Viresh, since he ACKed all the patches.
Could you take those patches and push them to 3.18 ?
I've applied the series and it is in my linux-next branch now (which means that it should appear in linux-next proper tomorrow).
I'm going to push it for 3.18-rc2.
Unfortunately this caused a regression (crash). Fix available in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/27/361
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds