11 Nov
2016
11 Nov
'16
9:52 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:52:21PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
@@ -456,8 +460,6 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
out: mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(policy); return 0;fail:
@@ -468,6 +470,10 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
sugov_policy_free(sg_policy);
- disable_fast_switch:
cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);pr_err("initialization failed (error %d)\n", ret); return ret;}
Argh, no indented labels please. Please fix the 3 that snuck in while you're there.
Well, you didn't tell me you didn't like them. :-)
Anyway, I can fix this up easily enough.
Any other concerns regarding the patch?
Thanks, Rafael