On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 09:31:54 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Cc'ing Thomas,
On 8 July 2014 10:20, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 July 2014 09:51, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
Yeah, having something like what you suggested from DT is the perfect solution to get over this. The only reason why I am not touching that here is to not delay other patches just because of that.
There are separate threads going on for that and probably somebody else was trying to push for that.
That's it, nothing more. I would definitely like to use those bindings instead of the crazy routines we are trying here, once that is finalized :)
Do we have some kind of agreement for this temporary solution? Anyways I will kick the other thread again to resolve the bindings soon.
Hi Mike/Rafael,
Thomas has a dependency on the patch adding "find_siblings()": http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg348080.html
Would it be fine to get this temporary solution (Only within cpufreq-cpu0 file, so that it doesn't become an API) for now and updating it later once bindings are closed?
I don't like that idea, but I wonder what other people think.
Rafael