On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
On 08-06-16, 02:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2016 03:55:13 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Rafael,
I have spent some more time on this stuff and finally came out with a very simple solution. I hope you will like it more than the previous versions.
Instead of trying to sort the freq-table passed by the drivers, which was complicated and would have broken some drivers for sure, this patch just checks if the freq-table is sorted or not.
If it is sorted, then we just use a different set of helpers for it. The table can be sorted in both ascending and descending orders now and helpers are present for both the cases.
Well, that's something I was thinking about from the start. :-)
All the patches are pushed here for testing in case anyone wants to try: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git cpufreq/sorted-freq-table
V3->V4:
- Written from scratch really, completely different approach.
I'll look at the code later this week.
Hi Rafael,
Did you get a chance to look at these? Steve may be blocked on this :)
I know, but I have stuff to do other than cpufreq.
And in particular regression fixes take precedence, of course.