On 15 April 2014 14:18, Pavel Machek pavel@ucw.cz wrote:
On Tue 2014-04-15 21:54:53, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
What I'm basically saying is that I see no reason for ARM to do something different to what x86 does.
What is pretty clear to me is that ARM is compatible with x86, which is compatible with kernel/reboot.c, and it's the hibernate code which is the odd one out.
I'm pretty sure the original code did not return. Anyway, the best solution, given how many platforms are out there, would be to
a) document that it should not return
b) fix hibernation to handle the returning case, anyway.
Thanks Russell and Pavel!
This sounds fine to me. Any objections?
Thanks!
Sebastian