Hi Kukjin,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@kernel.org wrote:
Vikas Sajjan wrote:
Adds RTC DT node to Exynos5420 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan vikas.sajjan@linaro.org
changes since v1: - made DT node status as "okay" in the dtsi file itself.
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 3 ++- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 7 +++++++ 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi index f65e124..4a8e223 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ interrupts = <0 54 0>; };
rtc {
rtc@101E0000 { compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc"; reg = <0x101E0000 0x100>; interrupts = <0 43 0>, <0 44 0>;diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index 88589b7..c82137b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi @@ -178,9 +178,10 @@ samsung,power-domain = <&pd_mfc>; };
rtc {
rtc@101E0000 { clocks = <&clock 337>; clock-names = "rtc";status = "okay";Well, according to the subject, 'add rtc dt node to exynos5420', this should be handled separately if required.
So, you want me to spit this 5250 modification to a separate patch OR Modify the subject line to match the changes.
}; tmu@10060000 {diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi index 9e90d1e..8f1bb08 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi @@ -145,4 +145,11 @@ clocks = <&clock 260>, <&clock 131>; clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0"; };
rtc@101E0000 {Please put in the address order or alphabetical.
Sure will do.
clocks = <&clock 317>;clock-names = "rtc";status = "okay";};No need last empty line.
OK.
- Kukjin
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html