Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core

On 02/07/2014 07:10 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this information to be shared across core.c and fair.c. As we can know if the cpu is going to idle or not with the previous patch, let's encapsulate the idle_stamp information in core.c by moving it up to the caller. The idle_balance function returns true in case a balancing occured and the cpu won't be idle, false if no balance happened and the cpu is going idle.

Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org

Reviewed-by: Alex Shi alex.shi@linaro.org