On Sunday, September 01, 2013 09:30:49 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 1 September 2013 18:58, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
On Sunday, September 01, 2013 10:56:02 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
We can't take a big lock around __cpufreq_governor() as this causes recursive locking for some cases. But calls to this routine must be serialized for every policy.
Care to explain here why it must be serialized?
Yes, added that to the attached patches (Added reported-by too):
OK, the attached patches queued up for 3.12.
Thanks, Rafael