18 Nov
2013
18 Nov
'13
11:01 a.m.
On 18 November 2013 16:27, Lan Tianyu tianyu.lan@intel.com wrote:
How about introducing a resume/suspend callback pointer or list(if there are several places that need to deal with cpu resume/suspend) in the struct cpu and populate it in the cpufreq_add_dev()?
The suspend/resume() of cpu_subsys needs to check the callback pointer and run it if available.
That's almost a new infrastructure then and looks more hackish :) Apart from that even cpufreq would be a bit hacky as we don't really need per-cpu callbacks..