Hi Alexandre,
On 06/23/2017 04:09 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 23/06/2017 at 13:40:41 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 06/19/2017 03:36 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
On 32bits platforms "struct timeval" or "time_t" are using u32 to code the date, this cause tools like "date" or "hwclock" failed even before setting the RTC device if the date is superior to year 2038 (or 2106).
To avoid this problem I add one RTC test file which directly use RTC ioctl to set and read RTC time and alarm values. rtctest_setdate allow to set any date/time given in the command line.
On this version 2 I add check of problematics years in rtctest like suggest by Alexandre.
Finally that had allowed me to test and fix rtc-st-lpc driver.
Benjamin Gaignard (3): tools: timer: add rtctest_setdate tool: timer: rtctest add check for problematic dates rtc: st-lpc: make it robust against y2038/2106 bug
drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c | 19 ++-- tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c
Hi Thomas/John,
I can take the first two patches in this series through linux-kselftest with your or John's Ack. Please review and let me know one way or the other.
Well, I'm the maintainer for rtctest.c and I'll make sure to also be the one for rtctest_setdate.c>
The third one is a rtc driver patch. Please let me know how do you want to handle this series soon we can get this into 4.13-rc1.
I'll take the three patches but I still have comment I didn't have time to give yet.
Okay. I will drop this off my radar then :)
thanks, -- Shuah