Re: [PATCH 16/16] hrtimer: use base->hres_active directly instead of hrtimer_hres_active()

On 28 March 2014 17:11, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:

@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ ktime_t hrtimer_get_next_event(void)

    raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_base->lock, flags);

•   if (!hrtimer_hres_active()) {
  

•   if (!cpu_base->hres_active) {
            for (i = 0; i < HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES; i++, base++) {
                    struct hrtimer *timer;
                    struct timerqueue_node *next;
  

@@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void) struct hrtimer_clock_base *base; int index, gettime = 1;

•   if (hrtimer_hres_active())
  

•   if (cpu_base->hres_active)
            return;
  
    for (index = 0; index < HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES; index++) {
  

These two changes are broken.. Would remove these and resend.. My tree is fixed though..