7 Mar
2013
7 Mar
'13
1:50 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Olof Johansson olof@lixom.net wrote:
This binding makes no sense to me. It needs to be substantially better documented, not just a couple of sentences that people that understand bit.LITTLE thoroughly can make sense of.
It also duplicates the cpu binding. I suspect this should instead be done through additions of the cpu bindings instead of duplication. So this needs to be substantially reworked.
Also, _ALWAYS_ cc devicetree-discuss on new bindings. get_maintainer tells you to do so.
-Olof