13 Oct
2015
13 Oct
'15
6:15 a.m.
On 12-10-15, 12:31, Saravana Kannan wrote:
Can we use the first CPU in the related CPUs mask? Instead of the first CPU that the policy got created on? The policyX numbering would be a bit more consistent that way.
Okay, checked this again. The problem is that ->init() isn't called yet and we are very early in the initialization sequence. So, we can't really know related_cpus yet. So I will keep it unchanged for now.
--
viresh